9 algorithms  |  8 properties  |  Table & card view  |  Filter by type

Encryption Algorithm Comparison

Compare AES, RSA, ECC, Kyber, ChaCha20 and more side by side. Filter by type, view security levels, speed, quantum resistance and standards.

Filter:
Algorithm Type Key Size Security (bits) Speed Quantum safe Block/Stream Sig size Standard

How to choose the right algorithm

For encrypting files and messages

AES-256 is the gold standard. It is fast, secure, and used everywhere — TLS, disk encryption, VPNs, and more. Use AES-256-GCM for authenticated encryption. ChaCha20-Poly1305 is a strong alternative, especially on mobile devices without hardware AES acceleration.

For key exchange and digital signatures

ECC (P-256 or P-384) is the modern choice over RSA — it provides equivalent security with much smaller keys. RSA-2048 is still widely deployed but RSA key sizes need to be at least 3072 bits for long-term security.

For post-quantum readiness

Kyber (ML-KEM) is the NIST-standardized replacement for RSA and ECDH key exchange. Dilithium (ML-DSA) replaces ECDSA and RSA signatures. SPHINCS+ (SLH-DSA) is the most conservative option — based only on hash functions.

What to avoid

DES was broken in 1997 and must never be used. 3DES is deprecated since 2023 (NIST SP 800-131A). Blowfish has a 64-bit block size making it vulnerable to birthday attacks in large data scenarios — use AES instead.

Classical vs Post-Quantum security levels

Classical algorithmClassical securityPost-quantum securityRecommendation
AES-128128-bit64-bit (Grover)Use AES-256 for long-term
AES-256256-bit128-bit (Grover)Safe for long-term use
RSA-2048112-bitBroken (Shor)Migrate to Kyber
ECC P-256128-bitBroken (Shor)Migrate to Kyber/Dilithium
Kyber-768192-bit192-bitNIST recommended
Dilithium3192-bit192-bitNIST recommended